翻訳と辞書 |
Muth v. Frank : ウィキペディア英語版 | Muth v. Frank
''Muth v. Frank'', was a law suit in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled a party denied writ of habeas corpus for violation of Wisconsin's laws criminalizing incest was not unconstitutional. The petitioners relied heavily on the Supreme Court's ruling in ''Lawrence v. Texas'' invalidating anti-sodomy laws two years prior, in which the Seventh Circuit rejected. ==Background== The case originated in the case of Allen Muth and his younger biological sister Patricia Teernstra Muth were legally married and had four children.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://wicourts.gov/html/ca/97/97-0852.htm )〕 Their second child, Tiffany, was developmentally disabled, but she was not genetically disabled. The couple was once a month late in returning to pick up the child from a babysitter, child services were called and told the couple had abandoned the child in the house of a baby-sitter. The abandonment led to the state of Wisconsin successfully seeking to have a court terminate their parental rights in respect to the child, on grounds of their incestuous parenthood as well as the child's condition and evidence that they had neglected her.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Muth v. Frank」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|